Trump Chews Out Crooked Special Counsel

Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

( – Former President Trump launched a blistering tirade against special counsel Jack Smith mere hours after Smith’s arraignment in a Miami court. Trump, who had earlier pleaded not guilty to a comprehensive 37-count indictment resulting from Smith’s investigation into his post-presidential handling of classified documents, unleashed a scathing attack on Smith’s character. With contempt in his voice, Trump derisively referred to Smith as a “deranged lunatic” and a “thug,” seeking to undermine Smith’s credibility and impugn his motives. In a fervent outburst, Trump went on to claim that Smith was an unabashed “Trump hater” whose hostility toward him was uncontrolled and rampant.

Trump did not shy away from critiquing Smith’s professional record either, asserting that it was “absolutely atrocious.” He insinuated that Smith had been appointed solely for the purpose of conducting a politically motivated “hit job” against him, casting doubt on the integrity of Smith’s investigation and the legitimacy of the charges leveled against him.

During the arraignment proceedings, Trump couldn’t resist drawing attention to an alleged connection between Smith and his spouse, Katy Chevigny. Chevigny, a documentary filmmaker renowned for her work on former first lady Michelle Obama in 2020, seemingly became a focal point in Trump’s critique, perhaps suggesting a perceived bias on Smith’s part due to his spouse’s affiliations.

Interestingly, despite his verbal assault on Smith, Trump made no effort to engage with the judge during the indictment hearing, opting to rely on his scathing public remarks instead. This selective targeting of Smith, combined with Trump’s penchant for disparaging judges and prosecutors involved in cases concerning his actions, has drawn widespread attention and raised concerns about the erosion of respect for the judiciary.

Notably, a state judge presiding over Trump’s hush money case in Manhattan recently revealed receiving a barrage of death threats following Trump’s derogatory characterization of the judge as a “Trump-hating judge.” This incident underscores the potential dangers of political rhetoric that undermines public trust in the judicial system and risks inciting violence.

Turning to the indictment itself, Trump finds himself confronting a multitude of charges stemming from Smith’s investigation. The 37 counts include serious allegations such as violations of the Espionage Act, obstruction of justice claims, and making false statements. The indictment points to the discovery of classified documents in various rooms within Trump’s opulent Mar-a-Lago estate, fueling the gravity of the charges against him and intensifying public interest in the case.

As this legal battle unfolds, Trump’s verbal onslaught against Smith and his ongoing confrontations with judges and prosecutors highlight the contentious and polarizing nature of his post-presidential actions and dealings. The unfolding events are shaping public perceptions and provoking debates on the boundaries of presidential accountability, the independence of the judiciary, and the resilience of democratic institutions.

Copyright 2023,