Shock Collar Torture Alleged In Manhattan

Hand signing legal document beside gavel and laptop — Photo: Pickadook / Shutterstock

Manhattan prosecutors say a 116-count indictment details hours-long torture of women with a shock collar, a cattle prod, and waterboarding inside a Midtown apartment.

Story Snapshot

Ryan Hemphill faces 116 charges tied to alleged multi-hour assaults on six women.
Prosecutors describe electric shocks, waterboarding, and forced restraints during attacks.
The alleged violence spanned October 2024 to March 2025 in a Midtown Manhattan unit.
Hemphill has pleaded not guilty and remains in custody pending trial.

What Prosecutors Allege Happened

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced a 116-count indictment of Ryan Hemphill. Prosecutors say Hemphill raped six women over five months in a Midtown apartment. The charging documents describe hours-long assaults involving electric shocks from a cattle prod and a neck shock collar. The indictment says he also waterboarded some victims and used heavy restraints during attacks. The office calls it a calculated, repeated pattern of violence across multiple victims.

Reporters who reviewed the filings say the case centers on a set of graphic acts. These include punching, forced submersion, and shocks to control and terrify the women, along with recordings kept as trophies. Prosecutors say the alleged attacks lasted for hours at a time. They also say the women were lured and overpowered inside the unit, then subjected to escalating force and threats. Hemphill has pleaded not guilty to all counts.

Timeline, Charges, and Custody Status

Court records place the alleged spree between October 2024 and March 2025. The indictment charges predatory sexual assault, rape, strangulation, and other offenses. The scope signals severe penalties if a jury convicts. Prosecutors say the pattern was not a single event but many multi-hour ordeals. They argue that the repetition shows planning and control. Hemphill remains jailed while the case moves forward. He contests the accusations and awaits trial.

Local coverage reports a seventh accuser later came forward with claims of a seven-hour attack. That account mirrors key methods from the indictment, including a shock collar and repeated submersion. Prosecutors describe a cycle of near-drowning, brief relief, and renewed submersion to the edge of blackout. They say this approach kept victims in constant fear and pain. The added charge further expands the case’s reach and possible witness list.

Why This Case Strikes a Nerve

This prosecution sits at the center of a broader worry: powerful people can wrap abuse in wealth and status. Prosecutors say Hemphill built a polished image and used it to lure and intimidate. That theme echoes many readers’ view that the system protects elites while everyday people feel exposed. When a case shows long gaps before capture or many victims, the public asks whether warnings were missed and why safety failed inside a major city.

This case also shows how modern cases build in public. The first detailed story often comes from a district attorney’s press release and court filings. News outlets then repeat those specifics because the documents are public and graphic. Defense details arrive later, if at all, and often with less reach. That pattern shapes how we see early claims and why trials, not headlines, must carry the final weight. Here, the facts will be tested in court.