Affair Bombshell Entangles Ex-Senator

Office door plaque with gold trim outside a glass-walled conference room — Photo: DCStockPhotography / Shutterstock

Court records show Kyrsten Sinema admitted a romantic, intimate relationship with her married bodyguard while fighting a lawsuit that could make her pay for “breaking up” a 14-year marriage.

Story Snapshot

Court filings say Sinema acknowledged a romantic relationship with her security guard in 2024.
The ex-wife’s North Carolina suit claims the affair helped destroy a 14-year marriage.
Sinema argues North Carolina courts lack power because encounters happened outside the state.
North Carolina is one of few states that still allow “alienation of affection” claims.

What the filings and testimony say

Public reports based on court filings state that former United States Senator Kyrsten Sinema acknowledged a romantic relationship with her onetime bodyguard, Matthew Ammel, starting in late May 2024. Coverage of her sworn statement places the first intimate encounter in California and lists later meetings in New York City, Washington, Aspen, and Phoenix, not North Carolina. Fox News likewise reported multiple encounters and quoted details drawn from case records. These accounts come from filings and a July 31 deposition described in the press.

The lawsuit by Ammel’s ex-wife, filed in Moore County, North Carolina, alleges Sinema intentionally interfered with the marriage and helped cause its collapse after 14 years. Local and regional outlets summarized the complaint’s claims and timeline, including messages and social outings that suggest growing intimacy. The plaintiff seeks damages under North Carolina’s “alienation of affection” law, which targets wrongful acts that destroy marital love and companionship. Bloomberg Law listed the case and identified the cause of action.

The legal fight now centers on where the case belongs

Sinema has moved to dismiss the case, arguing North Carolina courts do not have personal jurisdiction over her. Her filings focus on venue and jurisdiction, not on denying that the relationship occurred. She states the intimate conduct happened outside North Carolina, which she says defeats the claim in that forum. Outlets that reviewed her motion and declaration reported this defense and quoted her timeline for the relationship’s start in May 2024. A North Carolina outlet also summarized a response challenging her dismissal bid.

Jurisdiction matters because North Carolina is one of the few states that still allow alienation of affection claims. Plaintiffs must show a marriage with real affection, a loss of that affection, and wrongful acts by the defendant that caused the loss. That structure makes where the alleged injury occurred a key question. A filed complaint in the record confirms the claim was brought under North Carolina law, which keeps the older tort alive even as most states have ended it.

Why both left and right see a deeper problem

This case taps into a broader distrust of elites. People on the right see a powerful figure crossing personal lines and then using legal maneuvers to dodge a local court. People on the left see another example of insiders bending systems while families bear the cost. Both worries focus less on gossip and more on accountability. When rules look different for the well connected, trust in institutions erodes, and everyday families feel the damage first.

FORMER U.S. SENATOR ADMITS AFFAIR WITH MARRIED BODYGUARD

Former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema acknowledged in sworn testimony that she had a s**ual relationship with her then-married bodyguard while serving as Arizona senator, according to federal court filings.

Sinema testified in… pic.twitter.com/LQHJfMcQee

— Daily Tribune (@tribunephl) August 16, 2026

The narrow legal question remains: did Sinema’s actions wrongfully cause the loss of affection in a 14-year marriage under North Carolina law, and can a North Carolina court hear the case? The record so far shows admissions of a romantic, intimate relationship and a defense aimed at jurisdiction, not at denying contact. Until a judge rules on venue and evidence opens more fully, claims about causation and damages are not resolved. For now, the paper trail is clear on the basics and contested on the law.